Cows, Quarks, and Divine Simplicity

4478_8a09576r1-628x401

A week ago Cardinal George Pell publicly debated atheist celebrity Richard Dawkins on the subject of God’s existence. When Mr. Dawkins was asked about the cause of the universe, and how something could come from nothing, he replied that while his own theory cannot sufficiently answer this question, any answer would be better than something as complex as God. “Nothing is very, very, simple,” Dawkins says, “but God as a creative cause is very complex.”

Dawkins’ point is that an immaterial God has to be at least as complex as the material universe he creates that, therefore, God’s existence would itself require an explanation, just as the existence of the universe does. In point of fact, however, the Christian philosophical and theological tradition has always conceived of God as uniquely and utterly simple, i.e., without any division or complexity. St. Thomas Aquinas, for example, deals with this question in the First Part of his Summa Theologiae, and he explains why God, as the source of existence itself, must be simpler than the universe he created.

To see how this is true, we need to look at some concrete material beings, like cows. All cows share one thing in common: the fact that they are cows. This is their common “cow nature,” or what defines them as cows. But on top of this common cow nature, each cow has certain characteristics that make it “this particular cow.” One cow, Bessie, has a different spot pattern, for instance, or weighs more than her sister cow, Molly. These and other particular traits account for the fact that “this cow Bessie” and “that cow Molly” are not identical, despite the fact that they have the same nature.

This holds true for everything material in the universe. Even the smallest and simplest things, like electrons or quarks, still have some traits that make them more than just their natures. When we say “this cow”, “this electron,” or “that quark”, we mean something more than what defines any cow, any electron, or any quark. This is because a material thing is individuated from other material things simply by having matter and particular qualities.

In God, however, this does not happen. Whereas Bessie and the quark differ from their cow or quark natures by virtue of individual traits, everything that God is or does is identical to what he is, i.e., to his divine nature. For God, there is no difference between essence and existence. God is so simple that he is nothing but his divine nature. When God acts, thinks, loves, and creates, he does this just from what his nature is. As the cause of the universe and the source of all existence, God doesn’t receive his existence from anything. Instead, God exists through himself; it is his essence to exist; he is the necessary Being that grounds the existence of all contingent beings. Of course, we cannot understand what it means to be “existence itself”, but we do know that something identical with its own existence must be the most simple and most actual being possible.

Responding to the same question about the cause of the universe, Cardinal Pell said of Dawkins’ response that it “dumbed down God and souped up the universe.” Mr. Dawkins rejects God because he thinks a complex universe must have a complex cause. But the complexity of the universe does not imply that God is complex; it only implies that God’s simplicity transcends material limits. If God had created just one material thing, that one creature would not have sufficiently expressed his perfection. A whole universe of different kinds of material things, on the other hand, more fully reflects the divine goodness. Of course, the entire created order is only a pale reflection of divine perfection. Nevertheless, it still shows forth the splendor of its Maker. The heavens still proclaim the glory of God.

Image: Arthur Rothstein, Cow at Wabash Farms, Indiana

You May Also Enjoy:

Making Up for Lost Time If there is one thing that science fiction has taught us, it’s that time travel is hard. Sure, there are the technical difficulties related to the design of flux capacitors, the manipulation of the space time continuum, and the fact that it always seems to require dealing with shady figures and dangerous materials. Even more difficult is figuring out how not to completely ruin the present by your galavanting around in the past. The noble desire t...
Recovering Geocentrism Galileo's famous encounter with the Inquisition seems, despite the best efforts of his judges, to have completely demolished the reign of geocentrism. As is well known, the Copernican theory promoted by Galileo came under suspicion due to a supposed contradiction with Scriptural texts that describe the Sun's motion around the Earth. For the human authors of these sacred texts, such language likely simply reflects their astronomical knowledge. For...
Opening the Book of Revelation (Part IV) And he taught them at length in parables… —Mark 4:2 Yesterday we looked at prophecy in Scripture and saw that it needs to be interpreted in order to receive the message God is sending through it, and what that interpretation looks like. That was the first of our three points about prophecy in Scripture: 1. that it needs to be interpreted; 2. that it reveals its message to some people while concealing it from others; 3. and that it has mul...
Good and Evil, Life and Death Remember Rocky? Not the cartoon companion of Bullwinkle the Moose, but the streetwise South Philadelphia tough guy turned heavyweight boxing champ—the Rocky of the Hollywood movie set who, in film after film, overcomes insurmountable odds to triumph over a towering opponent in the ring. Though Rocky appears to be finished at some point in almost every fight, and even loses his first match against Clubber Lang (you might remember him as “Mr. T”), ...
Br. Athanasius Murphy, O.P.

Written by:

Br. Athanasius Murphy entered the Order of Preachers in 2010. He is a graduate of Providence College and studied Classics, Humanities and Philosophy there. He worked for a lawyer during his college years, but was intent on entering the Order of Preachers after he graduated college. On DominicanFriars.org